- |||||||||| Rituxan (rituximab) / Roche
Journal: Occlusive Vasculitis Following Intravitreal Rituximab Injection for Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma. (Pubmed Central) - Jun 24, 2024 Occlusive vasculitis is a rarely reported but potential complication of intravitreal rituximab therapy in patients who have been previously treated with the agent and may have delayed onset. A low threshold for fluorescein angiography as a diagnostic test for post-injection vision loss and prompt treatment with topical and/or oral steroids should be considered.
- |||||||||| Truxima (rituximab-abbs) / Indukern, Teva, Mundipharma, Celltrion, Nippon Kayaku, Rituxan (rituximab) / Biogen, Zenyaku Holdings, Roche
Journal: Rituximab reference vs biosimilar utilization for oncology vs nononcology indications. (Pubmed Central) - Nov 14, 2023 This exploratory study evaluated the uptake and costs of three biosimilars rituximab-abbs (Truxima Real-world evidence shows an increase in rituximab biosimilar adoption over time, with higher adoption for oncology vs nononcology indications and in nonacademic settings.
- |||||||||| Kesimpta (ofatumumab subcutaneous) / Novartis, Genmab, Briumvi (ublituximab) / TG Therap, Mavenclad (cladribine) / EMD Serono
Journal: Ublituximab (Briumvi) for relapsing multiple sclerosis. (Pubmed Central) - Mar 7, 2023 Real-world evidence shows an increase in rituximab biosimilar adoption over time, with higher adoption for oncology vs nononcology indications and in nonacademic settings. No abstract available
- |||||||||| Riabni (rituximab-arrx) / Amgen, AbbVie, Rituxan (rituximab) / Biogen, Zenyaku Kogyo, Roche
Review, Journal: A review of the totality of evidence in the development of ABP 798, a rituximab biosimilar. (Pubmed Central) - Jun 9, 2022 Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of ABP 798 with rituximab RP was demonstrated as a final step in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and in those with rheumatoid arthritis. Overall, the totality of evidence supported the conclusion that ABP 798 is highly similar to rituximab RP and provided scientific justification for extrapolation to other approved indications of rituximab RP.
- |||||||||| Riabni (rituximab-arrx) / Amgen, AbbVie, Rituxan (rituximab) / Biogen, Zenyaku Kogyo, Roche
Clinical, Journal: Non-clinical similarity of biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab reference product. (Pubmed Central) - Nov 25, 2021 Additionally, in vitro synergy of ABP 798 or RP with chemotherapeutic agents, in vivo xenograft studies in mice, and toxicological assessments in cynomolgus monkeys (including B cell depletion and toxicokinetics) were also conducted. Results from these non-clinical assessments contribute to the TOE supporting the biosimilarity between ABP 798 and rituximab RP across a range of primary and secondary MOAs and support justification for extrapolation to all indications of use for ABP 798 for which the RP is approved.
- |||||||||| Riabni (rituximab-arrx) / Amgen, AbbVie, Rituxan (rituximab) / Biogen, Zenyaku Kogyo, Roche
Journal: Analytical and functional similarity of biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab reference product. (Pubmed Central) - Sep 1, 2021 The results of the analytical and functional similarity assessment demonstrate that ABP 798 is highly analytically similar to rituximab RP. These results support the totality of evidence and the scientific justification for extrapolation of ABP 798 to all therapeutic indications approved for rituximab.
- |||||||||| Kesimpta (ofatumumab subcutaneous) / Novartis, Genmab, Mavenclad (cladribine) / EMD Serono, Lemtrada (alemtuzumab) / Sanofi
Journal: Drugs for multiple sclerosis. (Pubmed Central) - May 25, 2021 These results support the totality of evidence and the scientific justification for extrapolation of ABP 798 to all therapeutic indications approved for rituximab. No abstract available
- |||||||||| ABP 798 (rituximab biosimilar) / Amgen, AbbVie
[VIRTUAL] Totality of Scientific Evidence in the Development of ABP 798, a Biosimilar to Rituximab () - Nov 5, 2020 - Abstract #ASH2020ASH_5470; The sensitivity analysis of ORR using local assessments in the NHL comparative clinical study was consistent with results from the primary efficacy analysis; the maximum percent reduction in index nodal lesions was similar for central and local assessments of disease. These results further support that ABP 798 is similar to the RP across a range of efficacy evaluations as well as primary and secondary mechanisms of action and add additional supporting data to the TOE.
|